This is me!

This is me!

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

This is my last blog for the course “Issues and Trends in the Early Childhood Field”. The blogging has really helped me to learn about issues and trends all around the world. Below are three things I have gained from studying international websites.
1.      New Perspectives: As I studied international websites I was able to learn about the different cultures. I gained new perspectives on poverty, standards, school readiness, and many other issues and trends in the early childhood field. The main perspective that I gained was that each country is working towards something different in early childhood education. Some are focusing on academics while others are focusing on crisis and child maltreatment.
2.      Deeper Understanding: From studying the international website I learned that each country has an area in early childhood education. For us here in the United States we are working towards academic success, even more specific we are working on school readiness. By taking a look at what other countries our working towards I now understand why here in the U.S. we have a strong focus on school readiness.
3.      Poverty is everywhere: Before studying the international websites I was aware that poverty existed everywhere, but having reflected on these sites I have learned that poverty is everywhere, but it can take many different forms. Poverty isn’t always income level. Poverty can also look like deprivation. Deprivation is similar to poverty, but it takes into considerations a child’s shelter, sanitation, drinking water, health, food, etc.

In lieu of my increased knowledge from studying international websites I have set one goal for the field of early childhood when it comes to international awareness. The goal is for early childhood educators to partner with early childhood professionals from around the world to best meet the needs of all children.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Week 7 UNESCO Website alternative assignment

After viewing the UNESCO website I learned a lot about limited government funding for early childhood programs. As I study the field of early childhood education I learn about the importance of funding for the field and the limited amount that is available. One of my professional goals is to raise awareness about the funding for many early childhood programs.
The UNESCO website offers information about how there must be an evenly distributed amount of resources for all populations, but there is a greater focus for those who are living in disadvantaged regions (UNESCO, 2009-2014). There is a policy called “universalization”, when it is targeted appropriately can decrease the inequities where governments are looking to reach universal access, but at the same time it makes the poor a priority (UNESCO, 2009-2014). I learned that early childhood education is not always the primary focus in education though. Many resources end up going to other priorities such as primary education (UNESCO, 2009-2014). Even though it is important for resources to go to primary education it is even more so important to make sure that early childhood education is a foundation of basic education and a part of it (UNESCO, 2009-2014). Finally, there is a strategy of private sector involvement that supports the funding of early childhood programs (UNESCO, 2009-2014). It is important to be aware when using this non-profit funding that it is being used for those who cannot afford early childhood care and education (UNESCO, 2009-2014).
After having learned much more in depth information from the UNESCO website I find myself comparing it to early childhood education where I work. We are very fortunate for the government funding and support we are receiving. There is the need in the community for greater awareness of the importance of early childhood care and education, but at the same time I realize how far our community has come with this awareness. The importance of early childhood education is a more recent discovery and communities are working towards making early childhood a foundation for educational experiences.

References


UNESCO. (2009-2014). Early Childhood Care and Education. Retrieved from UNESCO: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/early-childhood/

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Sharing Web Resources Week 6

This week I decided to explore the maltreatment link on the zero to three website. I have not really looked at this area as it has not pertained to the topics we have talked about thus far. In this section of the site one can learn more about child abuse and neglect, impact of trauma, and safe babies’ court teams. Safe babies court teams is a project that began in developmental science. Their aim is to “1.    increase awareness among those who work with maltreated infants and toddlers about the negative impact of abuse and neglect on very young children; and,
2.    change local systems to improve outcomes and prevent future court involvement in the lives of very young children.” (Zero to Three, 2014).
When I researched the site about the issue of equity I was lead to a power point presentation titled “Implementing Strengths-Based Initiatives to Achieve Equity” (Mayoral, 2014). The power point showed a few different graphs. One showed childhood poverty in the US broken down by race and ethnicity and the other showed an early language gap which increases dramatically from ten months of age to thirty six months of age (Mayoral, 2014). The presentation discusses the inequity of children who are facing severe disadvantages when they begin school (Mayoral, 2014). The way this presentation talked about inequities really opened my eyes to the challenges that children are facing to succeed academically. I was always aware of the types of inequities that were out there, but the graphs really helped me to visualize the high numbers of children who are facing inequities and how it appears to be increasing. On the eighth and last slide of this presentation there is a list of seven strengths based policy and systematic changes Below are these strengths based policy and systematic changes.
1. Focus on strengths.
2. Empower and support communities.
3. Shift from family involvement to
culturally competent family engagement.
4. Reduce language barriers by providing materials in
native language.
5. Increase culturally and linguistically competent and
measures and services.
6. Increase supply of qualified, bilingual and bicultural
birth-to-three professionals.
7. Provide information and empower parents by helping
them understand child development, ways to promote
learning, and how to become their child’s advocate
(Mayoral, 2014).
The Zero to Three website offers some really great resources of articles to read in regards to inequities in the early childhood field. I recommend taking a look at some of these articles as they really put everything into perspective with research to back up the findings.

References

Mayoral, M. V. (2014). Implementing strengths-based initiative to achieve equity. Washington, D.C.: Zero to Three.

Zero to Three. (2014). The safe babies court teams project. Retrieved from Zero to Three: http://www.zerotothree.org/maltreatment/safe-babies-court-team/

Thursday, October 2, 2014

Global Children's Initiative

For the blog assignment this week I am taking a look at the Harvard University website on “Global Children’s Initiatives”. Early childhood around the world can look very different than it does in America. Recent years in America our focus has been on standards and school readiness. After reading about the “Global Children’s Initiatives” I am able to see that this is not always the focus in other countries. Children and crisis is one of these topics. For example in Haiti and Chile post-earthquake child status is something that is being looked at closer (Harvard University, 2014). Child mental health is being looked at more closely in China and child maltreatment is being looked at more closely in three of the Caribbean nations (Harvard University, 2014). As you can see each country has something that is a primary focus. As we talked about in past discussions it is important to take care of a child’s well-being in order to provide the best education for a child. From the information from the Harvard website one can see the various ways this can look in each individual country. When these needs are addressed or met a child will be more likely to thrive in their education.

References


Harvard University. (2014). Center on the Developing Child. Retrieved from Global Children's Initiatives: http://developingchild.harvard.edu/index.php/activities/global_initiative/

Saturday, September 27, 2014

Week 4 Sharing Web Resources

I have been studying the zero to three website. Based on our discussions this week I decided to take a closer look at the public policy tab on this website. Zero to Three is a research based resource for federal and state policy makers (Zero to Three, 2014).  The policy center is there to promote “good health, strong families, and positive early learning experiences for all infants and toddlers” (Zero to Three, 2014). In the fiscal year of 2014 there is a grant availbale to EHS programs to expand partnerships with child care centers in the community (Zero to Three, 2014). This is an example of efforts policy makers are making to expand quality early childhood programs in communities.  
When I browsed the website this week I found a section on discipline. One of the recommendations for parents was to comfort their babies whenever they cry. I feel this can be a controversial topic, because the way one comforts their child or how long they let their child cry for varies by culture. I believe that what the website is offering is simply recommendations, but some cultures may disagree with the suggestions for discipline. I found that many topics on the website such as this can be considered controversial based on culture. Each culture has a different perspective on child rearing and the website is promoting child rearing techniques for child care centers rather than individual cultures.

References


Zero to Three. (2014). Public Policy. Retrieved from Zero to Three: http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Poverty in Vanuatu


For this week’s assignment I have gathered my information from the UNICEF website. I have chosen to take a closer look at child poverty in Vanuatu which consists of 65 inhabited islands (UNICEF, 2012). By using the basic needs poverty line, seventeen percent of children are living in poverty in Vanuatu (UNICEF, 2012). The number of people living in a home and the amount of education the adults had in the home impacted whether or not a child was living in poverty (UNICEF, 2012). Due to the poverty level in Vanuatu I was surprised to learn that they also needed to look at deprivation (UNICEF, 2012). Deprivation is similar to poverty in the matter that it looks at the child’s shelter, sanitation, drinking water supply, health, food, education, and information (ex. telephone) (UNICEF, 2012). During a study in 2007 deprivation appeared to be more of a problem than poverty (UNICEF, 2012). There are broad policies in Vanuatu that are in place to promote child well-being, but due to the island location it is difficult to provide adequate resources to those who need it (UNICEF, 2012).

By studying poverty in Vanuatu this week I have learned that poverty will look different in each part of the world. This is because each location has different struggles. As you can see the biggest struggle with improving poverty in Vanuatu is the island location, because they are surrounded by 700,000 square kilometers of ocean (UNICEF, 2012).  I am interested to see what these challenges are for other locations around the world.


References



UNICEF. (2012). Global study on child poverty and disparities. Suva, Figi Islands: United Nations Children's Fund Pacific.


Saturday, September 13, 2014

Sharing Web Resources

·     
I chose to study the zero to three website. This is the link to the website:
I will not receive my first newsletter until the first of the month. For this assignment I will be gathering my information specifically form the zero to three website. As I looked closely at the website I found the issue of money. Often times in the society today a parent is looking to provide a better life for their child than what they might have had. On the zero to three website there is a chart titled “Juggling Jobs and Babies-the Challenges of Young Working Families” (National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families, 2012). Below is the chart from the website. The chart shows the issue of families losing the quality time spent with their child (National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families, 2012). The issue here is that families are unable to make enough money to provide for their family (National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families, 2012). Work sites according to this chart do not appear to provide a high percentage of paid time off to new parents (National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families, 2012). Finally, the chart shows the percentage that is taken out of a parent’s income to pay for child care (National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families, 2012). I believe this issue can stem into other issues. For instance a parent who is struggling to pay for child care and making ends meet is most likely a stressed out parent. My question is what is the effect of this stress the parent has on the child?
· 

Working Families Infographic

(National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families, 2012).

References

National Center for Infants, Toddlers and Families. (2012). Working Families Infographic. Retrieved from Zero to Three: http://www.zerotothree.org/public-policy/working-families-infographic.html